The new land reform and social upheaval race
News eyes 28 pm, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang arrived Kalaqinqi Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia, in the rain watching the plowing moisture, look spring plowing situation. Li Keqiang said that China's 1.3 billion people eating, dressing, increase nutrition, farmers have to rely on, let us end the jobs of the Chinese prison, no one social group will be more conservative than the farmers own land, nor what a community The Group will pay a little more than farmland or more revolutionary peasant farm rents too high, so in a sense, one is among the country's modern government stability depends hogan outlet sito ufficiale upon its ability to implement reforms in the countryside. in reform alternatives for farmers, this section, Huntington asserts iron mouth, a nation, especially the majority of the peasant population of the country, is stable, if the revolution will occur, with the farmers directly related to the situation. Farmers are individual land users under the national land ownership. This is a mixed land system. This gap between de jure and de facto, causing embarrassment on the identity of the farmers. China's current farmers, is a very special group. China did not own land individual farmers, only in the collective land to farmers, their social property should be national tenants. They only have their own homestead property, but not all the air max homme collective ownership of land. Because the collective ownership of land, causing some people to grasp the village through the countryside to become the actual owner of the land. In negotiations with land developers, they have kept their promises to become de facto annexation of land gainers. However, the concept of farmers where they are the masters of the land, so that they conflict with the village to become violent resistance to land developers. Such violence stems from land due to land ownership institutional institutional confusion this confusion, rural land for a few village leaders often a tool for personal gain. This situation occurs before the modernization, the performance is not obvious. With urbanization, the wave swept through rural land development, national tenant tn pas cher as an individual, can not resist from the city to kill the capital impact of land developers, plus representatives of the developer in the country's real estate owned enterprises engaged in land development, national tenant more no power to resist. They are a rapidly promote industrialization was plundered objects. National tenant farming on the land, after losing farming land, partial compensation, become a city of the beneficiaries On the surface, they leave the land, no other job skills, running out of land compensation, they will inevitably become a city not displaced, destruction of social stability and political stability land reform for the political system has a great stabilizing effect. Chinese social instability and unrest caused by the uncertainty of the land system. At present, China is one of state-owned land system, this land system is from the world, Wang soil evolved. Chinese ancient monarch regarded the land as private property. However, in actual operation, and allow land sales and acquisitions, the emperor of land ownership, only symbolic. Ancient social reality is private ownership of land. If we say dynasties, has private ownership of land, but can not escape the fate of the country is off, then the private ownership of land would not be a stable political system can not be guaranteed?
The problem is not private ownership of land, but that the government can not effectively use administrative means to protect landowners and land-owning farmers. Ownership of land is one thing, whether it can survive on the land, is another. Countries with legal protection against illegal annexation of land, protection of landowners basic living, social stability is the key issue. Encountered famine, effective government bailout, not a part of the land owners hogan sito ufficiale lost their land and become displaced, is the best way to avoid revolution, so farmers can not realize that as long as the land privatization, the government once and for all. Governments at all levels, particularly at the national level of government, in how to use the land, still has considerable responsibility. In the United States, countries in order to ensure the sustainable use of land, in 1907, the United States through inland waterways Research Council, making forests, water resources, mineral resources protectio